Saturday, 23 February 2008

Cloud Music

The web's a bit like a vacuum: it is sucking up all sorts of things off desktops, start bars and docks. Outlook and Thunderbird aren't really needed what with Gmail et al.. Microsoft Office is under threat from Google Docs and things like Empressr. Photo software is being supplanted with things like Flauntr, Flickr and Photoshop Express. Skype isn't really required if you use web-based Gmail chat. The list goes on....

This is so-called cloud computing, which as Google's head honcho says, "starts with the premise that the data services and architecture should be on servers" and not computer hard drives (source). In other words, all you may need in the future is a browser; everything else will be accessible via the net.

Music is the latest addition to the list. With a number of websites offering it free (chiefly LastFM from my usage but also Songza, BoomShuffle, Imeem, SpiralFrog, Qtrax and Pandora), iTunes may even become redundant and the idea of owning a track may be history. Instead, all your music would be within the LastFM (or equivalent) cloud, accessible and streamable on whatever your hardware, whenever you want, as long as you are plugged in.

Artists receive a share of the advertising revenue for having their tracks played, which as the LastFMers say is "redesigning the music economy".

As it stands LastFM is limited in its features with music streaming. For example, you can only build one playlist. But it will probably start getting as sophisticated as iTunes. At least, I hope it does.

I think 'cloud music' spearheaded by LastFM and others amounts to nothing less than a quiet revolution in the way we consume music and lays down a first draft for the future of music. I just hope it works.

Polarized journalism

Two screen grabs from the Daily Mail and Mirror. Headlines have been highlighted.

Sometimes two different stories will give an insight into the cogs of journalism. Here, this total contradiction just shows the amount of empty speculation at work.

Friday, 22 February 2008

Design and the Elastic Mind

Wish I could get to this exhibition in the MoMA which looks fascinating. There's about 3000km of water stopping me though. When will museums have online exhibitions?

Great opening credits

Often the opening credits get forgotten, what with the focus on the show's content. Yet the best have a way of immediately transporting you into the show's world. Here are a few of my favourites, in no particular order...

House
Beautiful mix of Da Vinci-style medical drawings, flyovers and human body CG set against Massive Attack's brilliant Teardrop.


Dexter
The morning routine suffused with graphic and chilling homicide allusions.


Weeds
Suburban conformity set against Malvina Reynold's Little Boxes (after Season One each new episode uses a different cover).


Six Feet Under
I have no idea what the proper name for that first musical 'strike' is, but it alone can take me into the world of one of the best shows in history. This opening sequence is just beautiful.


Darkplace
Few people have heard of Darkplace. Even fewer get it. But this opening sequence is the paragon of parody and a great snapshot of the deluded, troubled genius that is Garth Marenghi.


Carnivale
The sweeping and unusual epic that should never have been axed.


The Office (UK)
Grey Slough.


Scrubs
Just like the show and its characters this sequence is eminently likeable and upbeat.


Nip/Tuck
Plastic and sterile visuals coupled with The Engine Room's icy A Perfect Lie.


24
So this isn't the full sequence but the frazzled visuals and screechy, electronic sound are great.

Sputtr

Sputtr is great. Search multiple sites from one page and customise it too.Would be nice if the ugly banner ad weren't there and they put search-relevent text ads (like AdWords) in a box at the top of the ads. I think they would make revenue from this setup. Nevertheless, a super site.

Thursday, 21 February 2008

What is interesting?

The Curious Italian Goat - Photo taken in the Dolomites, 2004

What makes something interesting? Paul Silvia, a cognitive scientist has some answers. From his and others' research he reckons there are two things. The first is unsurprising, the second is less so.
  1. "an event’s novelty–complexity, which refers to evaluating an event as new, unexpected, complex, hard to process, surprising, mysterious, or obscure" (Silvia's 2008 CDIPS paper, p.58)
  2. "people feel able to comprehend them and master the challenges that they [the novelty-complexity] pose (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990)." (p.58)
This second point means that experts can be interested in things that cause novices to turn off because they have the knowledge to comprehend them.

This creates a self-fulfilling cycle: the more you are interested, the more you learn about something, the more interesting stuff there is.

Interesting things should then be novel and sufficiently complex to engender curiosity but comprehensible enough not to deflate that inquisitiveness.

Wednesday, 20 February 2008

For great ideas, keep secrets

(from Auntie P)

What is the best way of getting a group to solve complex problems? According to this study published in the Jan/Feb edition of Current Directions in Psychological Science, some members should be kept in the dark because if the whole group is flooded with good ideas people will settle for them instead of continuing searching for a potentially better idea. In other words, all the brains working on a problem get into single-file when they share information; when they come at the problem unaligned they are hunting the solution territory more effectively.

Work alone


This paper shows that it may be best to work with others out of sight, at least for manual jobs. This is because you involuntarily model other people's behaviour (probably something to do with mirror neurons) and this affects your own performance negatively. The study is concerned with manual tasks so it would be interesting to see what happens at a higher cognitive level.

Data made lovely

Tables, charts, numbers and all that prompt me to embark on completely unrelated journeys of imagination into other more interesting things. Data is boring. However, the Trendalyzer - a vast pot of data - is not. It is magnificent.

Set up by the Gapminder Foundation and acquired by Google last year (there was something Google-like about the simplicity, look and spirit of the software even before they got involved), this software “unveils the beauty of statistics by converting boring numbers into enjoyable interactive animations” (source).

I love it for its central idea (pooling lots of data and making it beautiful) and the execution (a simple, powerful and playful interface).

Better email

Big String gives you more control over email, including features like self-destruction, recall (it will bounce back out of their inbox), and prohibiting forwarding and printing. Might be handy...

Tuesday, 19 February 2008

Fatties eat until the credits

A new(ish) study out in Obesity interestingly shows that healthier people use internal cues - like not feeling hungry any more - to stop eating. Heavier people eschew these inner signals preferring to rely on external factors to stop eating. These include things like an empty plate or the end of the TV show they are watching.

No sweat

According to this study, air conditioning may exacerbate global warming by creating a feedback loop: the hotter it gets, the more AC is used, and the hotter it gets.

Solution to this problem has been put forward in the newly established International Journal of Sustainable Design. The paper suggests a natural way of cooling buildings through nifty architecture instead of energy hungry machines.

Monday, 18 February 2008

VW website

The brilliant new site from VW has a warming simplicity but a ferocious power. Well done Tribal DDB.

Phillip Toledano

Car salesmen, people's faces whilst they play video games, recently occupied offices, the anonymous, marks left on skin from objects and clothes, the artic and the internal desires and paranoia floating about in American life (pictured here) are just a few places Mr Toledano has pointed his lens. His often bleak compositions are quick to grab you visually (he was an art director in advertising for ten years) and force all sorts of questions on you. See more on his slick site.




Flock: a new browser

Flock isn't really all that new, but it is now stable. Based on Firefox's code it is perhaps the best example of Browser 2.0, kitting up users to deal more effectively with all sorts of Web 2.0 things.

It's chief advantage has been to take the staples of people's digital lives and sew them into the fabric of the browser itself.

Things I particularly like are the in-house blog editor; integration with Flickr, YouTube, Facebook et al; nice RSS feed reading (doing Google Reader's job); the My World homepage (doing what iGoogle does but better); and the media bar, where all sorts of web goodies are a few clicks closer than previously.

For me the best feature of all is the Web Clipboard, a shelf where things acquired on digital travels can be stored for a later time. That is going to be very useful to the sort of non-linear, 'ooh, that looks interesting' kind of browsing I do and will take the heat off my bursting bookmarks toolbar. Let's hope Firefox 3 has some of its features.